Sunday, January 15, 2006

CCUSD hears from the district's receiver

Peter Davis will be available to address questions from parents Monday ,January 16th, at 7:00pm.


Anonymous said...

Here is my question for this vagabond and theif; When you going to get the hell out of here and follow the law? I never support theifs. I never support liars. YOur puppet show has expanded. When are you going to support the constitution? Are you the kind of man who supports the theifery of land? Are you a communist? Are you tratior to America? Do you only support lies? I ask you, "When are you going to go away?"

Anonymous said...

because if congress can succeed in the theifery of land, like they are trying to commision; then america has fallen. Has fallen, Has fallen; But it is not yet! There are honest American's who will uphold the constitution. Who then are they? Where are they? Is it, they are waiting? Are they waiting to see you fail, before they take back the laws? Where is it written that theifery is part of America. The laws you make was an agreement between you and them. It never had a part of me. I never agreed. So, I ask you when are you going to go away. And let our men go free. You vagabonds! Ye, vipers!

Anonymous said...

What are you talking about? i dont understan what you are saying.

Anonymous said...

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Anonymous said...

We usually cut her some slack, Anonny.

Anonymous said...

I like that; print some more. I like that. Where in are you following your own law? Answer me this; if a person was convicted and put away for a crime that they did not do, and the price was paid; could they be charged and convicted if they went ahead and did the thing?

Anonymous said...

What the hell does all this gibberish have to do with the School Receiver?

Anonymous said...

LOUD NOISES!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Read Amendment X very carefully. Powers not expressly claimed under the constitution of the United States are granted to the states. Therefore, understand that a large portion of your fury should be directed toward state, county and local governments.

Even taking that in consideration, no sane person can make heads or tails of what you are so mad about.

Go take a nap, a few deep breaths, get a dictionary out and set it next to your keypad so you can learn how to spell thief and constuct a comprehensable sentence. When you have done those few sane things then attempt to write down your complaits. There are many of us who are interested, and many who would like to assist but, until we can figure out what you are so mad about its pretty hard to know if your complaint is legitimate or not. This blog is a pretty good place to blow off steam, but now you should be through with that, why not let us know what it is that you would like for us to help you with. There....that's much better.....

Anonymous said...

Now that you are all done with your rants could you answer my question?
If if a person had already paid the debt for what they did not do, would they have to serve there sentance again if they went ahead and done it?

And as to the state recevier; if you all admit that he needs to be there you are as much as saying that your school was inadiquate. I think that the students were getting scollerships.

Belly ack about the spelling now why don't you.
And I thank that person who posted the government law; or admendments or what ever you great educated persons call them.

And since I have nothing to do with the school and I have no children in it and the take over was based on false hoods, I wash my hands of it. Argue with some one else. I would still ask him when he is going to be gone and who thinks there children were stupid? I thought they were all pretty smart. But hey, If the government thinks they need to impose sanctions upon you; who am i to complain?

Anonymous said...

So for those of us who could not attend this Q & A session, please tell us what happened.

Anonymous said...

The last post asks a very valid question.

So far, there have been only two voices heard.

First, the voice of a very unhappy person who fails to address why he is so distressed.

2nd. The voice of those who are trying to get the first party to calm down and voice just why they are so mad.

Not every one who reads this blog lives in your area and certainly can't read your mind. Please one point at a time tell us what happened without opinion. Then, after you have stated all that happened, you may, if you wish, give your opinion, no one will blame you at that point. But, the simple thing that must be understood is that unless the question is known, the answer is useless.

Anonymous said...

Yes Ruth...If if a person had already paid the debt for what they did not do, would they have to serve there sentance again if they went ahead and done it?

Anonymous said...

Yeal 1/17/06 1:15 You're a perfect living example of the finshed product.

Anonymous said...

Please translate: If a person had already paid the debt for that they did not do, would they have to serve there sentence again if they went ahead and done it?

1.) What was the debt?
2.) Was it a legitimate debt?
3.) Why should you pay a debt for something you did? Debts are usualy associated with something you received in value that wasn't paid for at the time you took possession of it. The only debt that would require you to pay for something you did would be, for example, something determined to be a crime against society where a jail term or a fine or both were considered by the judge as payment for that type of debt. Even then without a guilty plea, a jury verdict or a verdict by a judge in a bench trial after hearing evidence presented and determining your guilt would cause you to have a debt to society. If you have been certified by physicians, licensed to practice medicine to be incompetent and a danger to yourself and others, a judge can send you to a mental hospital, but that is not considered a debt and you have committed no crime, you were determined to be ill and in need of professional help.
4.) would they hve to serve there (their) sentence again if they went ahead and done (did) it? This is most confusing. If you, or anyone served a sentence, imposed by a court for a specific length of time and, baring being held for bad behavior there should be no valid reason to serve time for the same offense twice. As a matter of fact, it is against the law. Now, if the same offense was committed on two separate occasions then there were two separate crimes and in all two probable sentences. Example: If you stole an automobile today and carried it to a certain location and sold it to someone for a certain amount of money, that is one count of theft. If the next day you steal a second auto and repeat the process the same as yesterday that is a second count of theft. These are two separate crimes.

If you served one prison term for one crime, are released, commit a second crime one of two things can happen. If you were released upon probation, you will be returned to jail without trial until the end of your first sentence. If you completed your comlete sentence then you would require a new trial and would be sentenced a second time for the new crime.

Anonymous said...

So, folks....

What are we to make of that flattering first report from the receiver's "experts"?

They say that the Colorado City School District is doing a pretty good job of educating their students.

I would have expected the receiver to conceal any good news.

That adds a little credibility to both the receiver and CCUSD.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like a good topic for a new thread.

The old ones are getting a bit stale.

Anonymous said...

The Receiver isn't taking over CCUSD because of the students' performance; he is involved because of the school's gross financial mismanagement.

onthestreet said...

Ahh, but have you seen the glowing favorable reports on that too. Malcontents can layer lie upon lie, and for the fact that it's a lie, it comes to naught.

onthestreet said...

Now, that doesn't say that there is no mismanagement in ANY society. They are the very ones that the Prophet expels. Because of mismanagement, the public schools of the whole nation have even now been taken over by the rules and funding blackmail of the federal Department of Education. You have only seen the tip of the iceberg.