Monday, March 13, 2006

Fundy Who are you?

I don't want to know specifically who you are, but where you are comming from? Do we have another Street on our blog?

42 comments:

red rocks girl said...

he is Street's twin

ATAR_i said...

No, he's too rational to be related to OTS. He says some stuff that's inflammatory, but you can have a conversation with him.

red rocks girl said...

that's true. he is probably enjoying himself....or or or he could be street's alter ego that does make sense and can carry on a 0normal converstion. I like that one

Anonymous said...

fundy is not street.street is pro-warren.fundy is anti-warren.

Anonymous said...

fundy is from centenial

The operative word being "from" perhaps?

onthestreet said...

Yup, like, shall we say... Pro-Christ vs Anti-Christ.

ATAR_i said...

I don't say that.

CHRH said...

You think Centennial people are anti-Christ OTS?

CHRH said...

I highly doubt Fundy is from C.P. And anyone who's paid attention knows he's not from C.C. Isn't it obvious, he can have a two sided conversation.

ATAR_i said...

Fundy - where are you from?

fundy said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Faithful Woman said...

What about Saturday and Monday morning meetings? Or Uncle Fred's home meetings?

onthestreet said...

Of course, anything that goes against Christ is Anti-Christ. I'm sure any thinking mind would agree.

Anonymous said...

Warren goes against Christ if anyone ever did, right on OTS, Warren is anti-Christ

fundy said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

When you say first ward is that the ppl in CC or CP?

onthestreet said...

Every word he speaks, every act he carries out, aligns with His word, which I have clearly outlined in this forum.

However, if you can point out for everyone one or two things that do not align with His Word, I will be glad to accept it as a fact. If you can't, then we can only accept that everything he says and does is true and correct. But you'd have to show specific things that don't align, and not just stoop again to name-calling.

onthestreet said...

I'm sorry fokes, the above was in reply to this:

Anonymous said...
Warren goes against Christ if anyone ever did, right on OTS, Warren is anti-Christ
3/13/2006 11:02 PM

ATAR_i said...

No you haven't.

Faithful Woman said...

Street
You show nothing to aline except your own perverted train of thought in it's own serpentine path.

Anonymous said...

No one can show ONE thing where Warren is anti-christ, because the quantity is much greater than ONE.

ATAR_i said...

I highly doubt warren is the anti christ. I don't think he weilds that much power.

Anonymous said...

fundy said...
I thought at one time maybe the FLDS had the truth. They don't, leadership is lacking at both wards, however second ward probably would be my pick of whats out there, at this point in time. But the leadership is unworthy. Maybe some better leadership will show up there. I think so.

Fundy you only need the leadership of Jesus Christ. This priesthood stuff is boggus.

Anonymous said...

anon. 3/14/06 9:58 PM

Amen

onthestreet said...

You all make my point quite well. He's legit.

ATAR_i said...

Not legit, he's human, he thinks he's a prophet, he probably has a personality disorder, most likely a pedophile and a thief.

Legit - is not exactly the adjective we would use to describe him.

onthestreet said...

Well, we become what we think. Ask any psychologist, and he only casts out the likes of your description. But that's okay. Good try.

fundy said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Fundy,
Do you hold the "Priesthood"?

fundy said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Strong is he who worketh the will of Warren/The Lord. What's the diff?

What a load of crap!
Pretend all ya want.

onthestreet said...

3/16/2006 1:11 PM

What! Are you still crying? Get of the crap-load and stop pretending you're still hurt, my child.

Here, here, now. Let me kiss it better.

Oh, that's a BIG boy! (or is it girl, goil, boil, no matter). I'm glad you're feeling all better now. Here, have some milk and cookies.

Anonymous said...

Street's asylum has two wards? Must be a high class place.

You're right concerning leadership. If you have Christ's, you don't need anyone elses.

onthestreet said...

NONNY Said (3/16/2006 10:17 PM):
You're right concerning leadership. If you have Christ's, you don't need anyone elses.

STREET’s Reply: Well, it’s good that you can acknowledge part of what I say at truth, and I acknowledge that much of what you say is wrong, for here you will see unequivocally that without the chosen apostles of Christ in YOUR generation, you will never see the Kingdon of Heaven:

Christ is a Hierarchy and a Hier or Heir to the throne. A hierarchy is many, a Celestial chain of command. You don't think your Redeemer is a loner, and destitute in the COUNCIL OF FRIENDS, do you? And he Himself says it (ALL CAPS to highlight the key points):

Rev. 20:4
And I saw thrones, and THEY SAT UPON THEM, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

Rev. 20:6
Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but THEY shall be priests of God and of Christ, and SHALL REIGN WITH HIM a thousand years.

Romans 10:14
How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear WITHOUT A PREACHER?

Acts 1
2. Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments UNTO THE APOSTLES whom he had chosen:

8 But YE SHALL RECEIVE POWER, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.

Rev. 14
1 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Zion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father’s name written in their foreheads.

4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.

Any man who has sexual relations with his wife, or girlfriend, or anyone else, IS DEFILED WITH WOMEN, for Christ is Immaculate, and demands the same of those who represent Him on the earth, and reign with Him in eternity.

Anonymous said...

If you don't know, and can't prove it, quit blowing smoke.

The preceeding post is evidential as to the need for ots to be institutionalized. His departure from the rhelm of reality is becoming more obvious.

onthestreet said...

Well, certainly, men who take advantage of women, wife or no, ARE INSTITUTIONALIZED every day. You can't escape.

Anonymous said...

Why would I want to? I've committed no crime.

onthestreet said...

Anonymous said...
Strong is he who worketh the will of Warren/The Lord. What's the diff? 3/16/2006 1:11 PM

STREET's Reply. There you go. See, no difference between the two. Are they the same man. Of course not, but the same doctrine and likeness.
Very good. You're coming along nicely.

Anonymous said...

Likeness?

The Lord looks like Warren?

That's not the image I have in my mind.

Not even close.

onthestreet said...

LOL: Hey, handsome is handsome, and honor is honor. Like Father, like son. If all men are the very image of God, then Warren is like God, right? Either that, or you claim that God is a liar.

Now, if one man fulfills God's Word more than others, including the plurality of wives like Jesus did, then they are MORE in God's image and likeness, correct?

Anonymous said...

Warren cannot be the anti-Christ (son of perdition) because he doesn't know enough. He doesn't even know enough to be a good SOB.

onthestreet said...

3/21/2006 3:45 PM:
That is SO true. Therefore, he not being against Christ, he is FOR Christ. He not being from a bitch or dog-like, he is legit, well-bread, of the pure blood of Israel. He doesn't know enough evil to be anything else.

That was a very fine observation, Nonny.